Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTSTable of Contents

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Table of Contents

April 6, 2018

3, 2020
To our Shareholders:

        You are cordially invited to attend the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Texas Roadhouse, Inc. on Thursday, May 17, 2018.14, 2020. The meeting will be held at the Texas Roadhouse Support Center located at 6040 Dutchmans Lane, Louisville, Kentucky at 9:00 a.m. eastern daylight time.

        The official Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and Proxy Card are enclosed with this letter.

        Please take the time to read carefully each of the proposals for shareholder action described in the accompanying proxy materials. Whether or not you plan to attend, you can ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting by promptly completing, signing and dating your proxy card and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. Shareholders of record can also vote by touch-tone telephone from the United States, using the toll-free number on the proxy card, or by the Internet, using the instructions on the proxy card. If you attend the meeting, then you may revoke your proxy and vote your shares in person.

        Your interest and participation in the affairs of the Company are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your continued support.

		Sincerely,
		Sincerely,
		W. Kent Taylor Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President

Table of Contents

TEXAS ROADHOUSE, INC.
6040 Dutchmans Lane
Louisville, Kentucky 40205

NOTICE OF 20182020 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 17, 201814, 2020

To the Shareholders:

        The 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting") of Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (the "Company") will be held at the Texas Roadhouse Support Center located at 6040 Dutchmans Lane, Louisville, Kentucky on Thursday, May 17, 201814, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. eastern daylight time.

        At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to:

•

elect twofive directors to the Board of Directors, each for a term of one year;



•

ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent auditors;



•

hold an advisory vote on executive compensation; and



•

transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

        A Proxy Statement describing matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting is attached to this notice. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 19, 201816, 2020 are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting.Annual Meeting.

		By Order of the Board of Directors,
		Celia CatlettChristopher C. Colson General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Louisville, Kentucky
April 6, 20183, 2020

IMPORTANT

WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO BE PRESENT AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR VOTE USING ONE OF THE VOTING METHODS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED MATERIALS. IF YOU ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, THEN YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR PROXY AND VOTE YOUR SHARES IN PERSON.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE 20182020 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 17, 2018:14, 2020: Our Annual Report containing our Proxy Statement related to our 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders our Annual Report onand Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended on December 26, 2017 and our Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended on December 26, 2017 are31, 2019 is available on our website atwww.texasroadhouse.com in the Investors section.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT
2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD MAY 14, 2020

TEXAS ROADHOUSE, INC.
6040 Dutchmans Lane
Louisville, Kentucky 40205

PROXY STATEMENT

2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 17, 2018

        This proxy statement and accompanying proxy card are being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the board of directors (the "Board") of Texas Roadhouse, Inc., a Delaware corporation, to be voted at the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting") and any adjournments thereof. In this proxy statement, references to the "Company," "we," "us" or "our" refer to Texas Roadhouse, Inc. This proxy statement and accompanying proxy card are first being mailed to shareholders on or about April 6, 2018.3, 2020.

        The Annual Meeting will be held at the Texas Roadhouse Support Center located at 6040 Dutchmans Lane, Louisville, Kentucky on Thursday, May 17, 201814, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. eastern daylight time, for the purposes set forth in this proxy statement and the accompanying notice of the Annual Meeting.

SUMMARY OF MATTERS REQUIRING SHAREHOLDER ACTION

Proposal 1—Election of Directors

        The affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of the Company's common stock present in person or represented by proxy is required to elect each nominee. Election by a plurality means that the director nominee with the most votes for the available slot is elected for that slot. You may vote "FOR" each nominee or you may "WITHHOLD AUTHORITY" to vote for each nominee. Unless you "WITHHOLD AUTHORITY" to vote for a nominee, your proxy will be voted "FOR" the election of the individuals nominated as directors.

        Our Board has adopted a majority voting policy for uncontested director elections. Under this policy, any nominee who receives fewer "FOR" votes than "WITHHOLD" votes is required to offer his or her resignation. Our nominating and corporate governance committee would then consider the offer of resignation and make a recommendation to our independent directors as to the action to be taken with respect to the offer.

The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" the nominees.THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE NOMINEES.

Proposal 2—Ratification of Independent Auditors

        The proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 25, 201829, 2020 must be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present (in person or by proxy) and entitled to vote. You may vote "FOR" or "AGAINST" the ratification, or you may "ABSTAIN" from voting on this proposal. A vote to "ABSTAIN" will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" this proposal.

The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" this proposal.THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THIS PROPOSAL.

Proposal 3—Advisory Vote on Approval of Executive Compensation

        The outcome of the advisory vote on whether to approve the executive compensation detailed in this proxy statement (including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Executive Compensation section and the other related executive compensation tables and related discussions) will be determined by

Table of Contents

the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present (in person or by proxy) and entitled to vote.

Table of Contents

You may vote "FOR" or "AGAINST" approval of the executive compensation, or you may "ABSTAIN" from voting on this proposal. A vote to "ABSTAIN" will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" approval of the executive compensation.

The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" this proposal.THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THIS PROPOSAL.

Other Matters

        As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board knows of no matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than those matters discussed in this proxy statement. If any other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting and call for a vote of shareholders, then validly executed proxies in the enclosed form returned to us will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board, or, in the absence of such a recommendation, in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holders. Any such additional matter must be approved by an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present (in person or by proxy) and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Table of Contents

INFORMATION ABOUT PROXIES AND VOTING

Record Date and Voting Securities

        The Board has fixed the record date (the "Record Date") for the Annual Meeting as the close of business on March 19, 2018.16, 2020. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. At the close of business on the Record Date, there were outstanding 71,412,46969,355,085 shares of common stock, each of which is entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting.

        The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Shares of common stock represented by properly executed proxies received before the close of voting at the Annual Meeting will be voted as directed by such shareholders, unless revoked as described below.

Revocability of Proxies

        A shareholder who completes and returns the proxy card that accompanies this proxy statement may revoke that proxy at any time before the closing of the polls at the Annual Meeting. A shareholder may revoke a proxy by voting at a later date by one of the methods described on the proxy card or by filing a written notice of revocation with, or by delivering a duly executed proxy bearing a later date to, the Corporate Secretary of the Company at the Company's main office address located at 6040 Dutchmans Lane, Louisville, Kentucky 40205 at any time before the Annual Meeting. Shareholders may also revoke proxies by delivering a duly executed proxy bearing a later date to the inspector of election at the Annual Meeting before the close of voting or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. You may attend the Annual Meeting even though you have executed a proxy, but your presence at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy.

Solicitation of Proxies

        The cost of solicitation of proxies being solicited on behalf of the Board will be borne by us. In addition to solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited personally, by telephone or other means by our directors, officers or employees, who receive no additional compensation for these solicitation activities. We will, upon request, reimburse brokerage houses and persons holding common stock in the names of their nominees for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in sending materials to their principals.

Other Voting Considerations

Broker Non-VotesNon-Votes.

    Under rules of the New York Stock Exchange, matters subject to shareholder vote are classified as "routine" or "non-routine." In the case of routine matters, brokers may vote shares held in "street name" in their discretion if they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. In the case of non-routine matters, brokers may not vote shares unless they have received voting instructions from the beneficial owner ("broker non-votes"); therefore, it is important that you complete and return your proxy early so that your vote may be recorded.

        The election of directors (Proposal 1) is a non-routine matter under the applicable rules so broker non-votes may occur. However, broker non-votes do not count as shares entitled to vote. Because the election is decided by a plurality of shares present (in person or by proxy) and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, and because our majority voting policy for directors only considers "FOR" votes and "WITHHOLD" votes, any broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of this proposal.

        The ratification of the appointment of the Company's independent auditors (Proposal 2) is a routine matter under the applicable rules so broker non-votes should not occur. In addition, because

Table of Contents

this matter is routine and brokers may vote as stated above, the number of votes cast, plus the number of abstentions, on Proposal 2 will be used to establish whether a quorum is present.

Table of Contents

        The advisory vote on the approval of executive compensation (Proposal 3) and any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting are also non-routine matters under the applicable rules so broker non-votes may occur. Because broker non-votes do not count as shares entitled to vote, they do not affect the outcome of the vote on Proposal 3.

Abstentions        Abstentions.

    Abstentions will be counted for purposes of calculating whether a quorum is present. The effect of an abstention on each proposal where "ABSTAIN" is a voting choice is discussed above.

Executed but Unmarked ProxiesProxies.

    If no instructions are given, then shares represented by properly executed but unmarked proxies will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board, or, in the absence of such a recommendation, in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holders.

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND OUR BOARD

Director BiographiesSummaries

Gregory N. Moore.    Mr. Moore, 68, served as the Senior Vice President and Controller of Yum! Brands, Inc. until he retired in 2005. Yum! Brands is the worldwide parent company of Taco Bell, KFC and Pizza Hut. Prior to becoming Yum! Brands' Controller, Mr. Moore was the Vice President and General Auditor of Yum! Brands. Before that, he was with PepsiCo, Inc. and held the position of Vice President, Controller of Taco Bell and Controller of PepsiCo Wines & Spirits International, a division of PepsiCola International. Before joining PepsiCo, he was an Audit Manager with Arthur Young & Company in its New York, New York and Stamford, Connecticut offices. Mr. Moore is a certified public accountant in the States of New York and California. In July 2011, Mr. Moore joined the board of Newegg, Inc., a privately held on-line retailer specializing in computer and computer-related equipment, and serves as the chair of the audit committee. Mr. Moore also serves on the board of EF&TRH Restaurants (HK) Holding Limited, a Texas Roadhouse, Inc. joint venture in China. Mr. Moore has served as a director since 2005 and was nominated as a director because of his extensive financial and accounting experience in the restaurant industry. As a result of these and other professional experiences, Mr. Moore possesses particular knowledge and experience that strengthens the Board's collective qualifications, skills and experience.

James F. Parker.    Mr. Parker, 71, retired as Chief Executive Officer and Vice-Chairman of the Board of Southwest Airlines Co., a position he held from June 2001 through July 2004. Before serving at Southwest Airlines as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Parker served as General Counsel of that company from 1986 until June 2001, and was previously a shareholder in the San Antonio, Texas law firm of Oppenheimer, Rosenberg, Kelleher and Wheatley. Mr. Parker serves as a member of the board of directors of Sammons Enterprises, Inc. and the board of directors of two wholly owned subsidiaries of Sammons Enterprises, Inc., Midland Life Insurance Company and North American Company for Life and Health Insurance, all private companies. Mr. Parker also serves as the chairman of the compensation committee for Sammons Enterprises, Inc. and on the audit committees for Sammons Enterprises, Inc., Midland Life Insurance Company and North American Company for Life and Health Insurance. Mr. Parker has served as a director since 2004 and was nominated as a director because of his chief executive experience, his knowledge of the value-based service industry and the similarity of cultures between Southwest Airlines and Texas Roadhouse. As a result of these and other professional experiences, Mr. Parker possesses particular knowledge and experience that strengthens the Board's collective qualifications, skills and experience.

W. Kent Taylor.    Mr. Taylor, 62, is our founder, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer, a position he resumed in August 2011. Mr. Taylor previously served as Chief Executive Officer from 2000 until 2004, at which time Mr. Taylor became Chairman of the Company, an executive position. Before his founding of our concept in 1993, Mr. Taylor founded and co-owned Buckhead Bar and Grill in Louisville, Kentucky. Mr. Taylor was appointed to the Board of Directors of Papa John's International, Inc. in May 2011. Mr. Taylor has served as a director since 2004 and is being nominated as a director because of his chief executive experience, his knowledge of the restaurant industry and his intimate knowledge of the Company as its founder. As a result of these and other professional experiences, Mr. Taylor possesses particular knowledge and experience that strengthens the Board's collective qualifications, skills and experience.

Kathleen M. Widmer.    Ms. Widmer, 56, is the President of the Johnson & Johnson Consumer OTC division, which provides healthcare solutions through well-known and trusted over the counter medicines and products, a position she has held since August 2015. She was previously with Johnson & Johnson for 21 years, until 2009, where she held numerous positions, including serving as Vice President, Marketing, McNeil Consumer Healthcare. Prior to re-joining Johnson & Johnson, she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer at Elizabeth Arden, Inc. from 2009 to 2015, and was responsible for the global growth strategy and marketing execution of the Elizabeth Arden Brand as well as the

Table of Contents

company's extensive portfolio

Table of fragrances. In 2017, she was appointed to the board of directors for the Wounded Warrior Project. She is a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy in West Point, N.Y. and served for five years as a U.S. Army officer. She held positions of increasing responsibility in the Field Artillery, reaching the rank of Captain and Battery Commander of a 400-soldier training unit in Fort Sill, Oklahoma. Ms. Widmer has served as a director since 2013 and was nominated as a director because of her extensive marketing experience in the retail sector and her knowledge of the global retail industry. As a result of these and other professional experiences, Ms. Widmer possesses particular knowledge and experience that strengthens the Board's collective qualifications, skills and experience.

James R. Zarley.    Mr. Zarley, 73, has served as chairman, chief executive officer and chairman of the board of Conversant, a single-source provider of media, technology and services across major interactive marketing channels which previously operated under the name ValueClick, Inc., and was a member of Conversant's board of directors from 1999 until his retirement in 2014. Mr. Zarley shaped the company into a global leader in online marketing solutions. Prior to joining Conversant, Mr. Zarley was chief operating officer of Hiway Technologies, where he was a leading member of the management team that closed the merger with Verio in 1999. Prior to that, Mr. Zarley was chairman and chief executive officer of Best Internet until it merged with Hiway Technologies in 1998. Mr. Zarley also founded and later sold Quantech Information Services, now an ADP company. In addition, he spent 19 years at RCA in various senior management roles. Currently, he serves on the board of directors of several private companies. Mr. Zarley has served as a director since 2004 and is being nominated as a director because of his chief executive experience in a developing industry, his information technology experience and his experience in acquisitions. As a result of these and other professional experiences, Mr. Zarley possesses particular knowledge and experience that strengthens the Board's collective qualifications, skills and experience.Contents

Board Declassification

        Historically, the Board was divided into three separate classes of directors. After careful consideration and review of past votes of our shareholders on Board declassification in prior years, together with prior communications with our investors and shareholders, the Board determined that a shareholder proposal to eliminate the classification of the Board was in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders and elected to recommend that the shareholders of the Company vote to declassify the Board beginning at the 2017 annual meeting. Following receipt of the majority of votes at the 2016 annual meeting to declassify the Board, the Company memorialized the declassification of the Board in the Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation for the Company dated May 19, 2016. Each director will continue to serve for the remainder of their respective term until the 2019 annual meeting at which all of the directors will be eligible for re-election for one-year terms. Messrs. Taylor and Zarley are currently nominated for re-election for a term of one year. The term for each of Messrs. Moore and Parker and Ms. Widmer is scheduled to expire at the 2019 annual meeting.

Meetings of the Board

        The Board met on sixeight occasions and its standing committees (audit committee, compensation committee, and nominating and corporate governance committee) met on 24 occasions during our fiscal year ended December 26, 2017.31, 2019. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and its committees on which such director served during his or her period of service. In addition, the Company expects all members of the Board to attend the Annual Meeting. All incumbent directors attended the 20172019 annual meeting. Four regular Board meetings are currently scheduled for the 2020 fiscal year 2018.year. Executive sessions of non-employee directors, without management directors or employees present, are typically scheduled in conjunction with each regularly scheduled Board meeting. The role of each standing committee is more fully discussed below.

        The audit committee is also directly responsible for the following: (a) pre-approving all audit and permitted non-audit related services provided by our independent auditors, (b) the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the Company's independent auditors, and (c) periodically evaluating whether or not the Company should rotate the independent auditors utilized by the Company. In connection with the audit committee's appointment of the Company's independent auditors, the audit committee evaluates the service level of the incumbent independent auditor on an annual basis, which includes criteria such as prior year quality of service, industry and technical expertise, independence, resource availability, and reasonableness and competitiveness of fees, as well as solicits the input of key management employees during its evaluation. The audit committee reviews all of the Company's earnings press releases and Quarterly and Annual Reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K, respectively, prior to filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"(the "SEC"). The audit committee is also responsible for producing an annual report on its activities for inclusion in this proxy statement. All of the members of the audit committee are "independent," as that term is defined in the listing standards under NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2) and meet the criteria for independence under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules adopted by the SEC. The audit committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Moore, Parker,Warfield, and Zarley. Mr. Moore chairs the audit committee. The Board evaluated the credentials of and designated Mr.Messrs. Moore and Warfield as an audit committee financial expert.experts. The audit committee met 1514 times during fiscal year 2017.2019, which were comprised of six regular meetings of the audit committee, and two meetings per quarter relating to the audit committee's review of the Company's filings with the SEC.

        Compensation Committee.    As described in its charter, the compensation committee:

          (i)  assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to the design, administration and oversight of employee compensation programs and benefit plans of the Company's executive officers,officers;

         (ii)  discharges the Board's duties relating to the compensation of the Company's executive officers and directors,non-employee directors; and

        (iii)  reviews the performance of the Company's executive officers.

        The compensation committee is also responsible for reviewing and discussing with management the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis"

Table of Contents

in this proxy statement and recommending its inclusion in this proxy statement to the Board. All of the members of the compensation committee are "independent" under all applicable rules, including the listing standards under NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2) and the requirements of the SEC. The current members of the compensation committee are Ms. Widmer

Table of Contents

and Messrs. Moore, Parker,Warfield, and Zarley. Mr. ParkerZarley currently chairs the compensation committee. The compensation committee met six times during fiscal year 2017.2019.

        Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.    As described in its charter, the nominating and corporate governance committee assists ourthe Board in:

          (i)  identifying individuals qualified to become Board members and recommending nominees to the Board either to be presented at the annual meeting or to fill any vacancies,vacancies;

         (ii)  considering and reporting periodically to the Board on matters relating to the identification, selection and qualification of director candidates,candidates;

        (iii)  developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance principles,principles; and

        (iv)  overseeing the evaluation of the Board, its committees, and its incumbent members.

        The nominating and corporate governance committee routinely evaluates the size and composition of the Board and the variety of professional expertise represented by the Board members in relation to the Company's business. To assist in this process, the nominating and corporate governance committee has identified certain interpersonal skills and professional skills desirable for some and/or all of the directors on the Board. The interpersonal skills are personal attributes that each director should possess and include ethics and integrity, leadership skills, negotiation skills and crisis management skills. The professional skills are an assessment of governance and industry based skill areas which should be held collectively by the Board but not necessarily by each director and contain skills relating to (i) financial, risk and compliance skills, (ii) governance and management skills, and (iii) sector and industry specific skills. All of the members of the nominating and corporate governance committee are "independent" under all applicable rules, including the listing standards under NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2) and the requirements of the SEC. The current members of the nominating and corporate governance committee are Ms. Widmer and Messrs. Moore, Parker,Warfield, and Zarley. Mr. Moore chairs the nominating and corporate governance committee. The nominating and corporate governance committee met threefour times during fiscal year 2017.2019.

Policy Regarding Consideration of Candidates for Director

        Shareholder recommendations for Board membership should include, among other items,at a minimum, the name of the candidate, age, contact information, present principal occupation or employment, qualifications and skills, background, last five years' employment and business experience, a description of current or previous service as director of any corporation or organization, other relevant biographical information, and the nominee's consent to service on the Board. A shareholder nominee will be requested to complete a detailed questionnaire in the form that current non-employee directors and executive officers of the Company complete.

        The nominating and corporate governance committee may consider such other factors as it may deem are in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. The Board has adopted corporate governance guidelines which provide that, if and when the Board determines that it is necessary or desirable to add or replace a director, the nominating and corporate governance committee will seek diverse candidates, taking into account diversity in all respects (including gender, race, age, board service, background, education, skill set, and financial acumen, along with knowledge and experience in areas that are relevant to the Company's business), when forming the nominee pool. The nominating and corporate governance committee has reviewed the process used in the selection of director candidates and concluded that the pool contained a diverse group of candidates. The manner in which the nominating and corporate governance committee evaluates a potential nominee will not differ based on whether the nominee is recommended by a shareholder of the Company.

Table of Contents

        The Company currently retains a corporate recruiter to assist in identifying candidates for open positions at the Company. Upon request, this recruiter also assists in identifying and evaluating candidates for director, but the Company does not pay an additional fee for this service.

Compensation of Directors

        As further discussed in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," the compensation committee engaged Willis Towers Watson as an independent compensation consultant in 2017 to advise the compensation committee on the compensation for our executive officers and non-employee director compensation.directors. Specifically, the compensation

Table of Contents

committee asked the compensation consultant to provide market data, review the design of the compensation packages for our executive officers and non-employee director compensation packages,directors, and provide recommendationsguidance on cash and equity compensation for our executive officers and non-employee directors.directors, including, without limitation, the issuance of restricted stock units to our non-employee directors and executive officers as more particularly described in this proxy statement. Similar to our compensation philosophy for our executive officers, we believe that issuing restricted stock units to our non-employee directors aligns their interests with those of our shareholders. Specifically, since the bulk of each non-employee director's compensation lies in the value of the restricted stock units granted, the non-employee directors are motivated to continually improve the Company's performance in the hope that the performance will be reflected by the stock price on the vesting date of their restricted stock units. Moreover, we believe that the restricted stock unit awards drive director alignment with maximizing shareholder value because the value of the restricted stock units varies in response to investor sentiment regarding overall Company performance at the time of vesting.

        As described more fully below, the following table summarizes the total compensation earned for fiscal year 20172019 for each of the non-employee directors.

20172019 Director Compensation Table

Table of Contents

Table of his decision to withdraw his name from nomination for re-election as a director at the Company's 2017 annual meeting. This amount reflects amounts earned by Mr. Ramsey for his partial 2017 fiscal year service.Contents

        Non-employeeAll non-employee directors each received the following cash compensation relating to their 2019 fiscal year service:

(i)

each non-employee director received a base fee of $12,500 for their 2017 fiscal year service. In addition and for their 2017 fiscal year service, $25,000;



(ii)

the Lead Independent director received a fee of $20,000, $20,000;



(iii)

the chairperson of the audit committee received a fee of $20,000, $20,000;



(iv)

the chairperson of the compensation committee received a fee of $10,000, and $10,000;



(v)

the international liaisonInternational Liaison received a fee of $15,000. Each$20,000;



(vi)

each non-employee director received $2,000 for each Board meeting he or she attended in person and $500 for each Board meeting he or she participated in telephonically. Additionally, telephonically; and



(vii)

each non-employee director received $1,000 for each committee meeting he or she attended in person and $500 for each committee meeting he or she participated in telephonically.

        In January 2015, the non-employee directors were each granted 25,500 restricted stock units, which vest in one-third increments of 8,500 restricted stock units each year over three years, subject to the non-employee director's continued service on the Board. Similar to our compensation philosophy for our Named Executive Officers, we believe that issuing these restricted stock units to our non-employee directors aligns their interests with those of our shareholders. Specifically, since the bulk of each non-employee director's compensation lies in the value of the restricted stock units granted, the non-employee directors are motivated to continually improve the Company's performance in the hope




Table of Contents

that the performance will be reflected by the stock price on the vesting date of their restricted stock units. Moreover, because the restricted stock unit awards for our non-employee directors vest over a period of time and their value varies in response to investor sentiment regarding overall Company performance at the time of vesting, we believe that these restricted stock unit awards drive director alignment with maximizing shareholder value.

Code of Conduct

        The Board has approved and adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all directors, officers and employees, including the Company's principal executive officer and the principal financial officer. The Code of Conduct is available in its entirety on the Company's website,www.texasroadhouse.com. The Company intends to post amendments to, or waivers from, its Code of Conduct, if any, that apply to the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer on its website.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

        Our Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines to further align the financial interests of the Company's executive officers and non-employee directors with the interests of our shareholders. The guidelines provide that our Chief Executive Officer should own, at a minimum, the lesser of 100,000 shares or $2,500,000 in then-current market value, our President should own, at a minimum, the lesser of 40,000 shares or $1,000,000 in then-current market value, and our other named executive officers and non-employee directors should own, at a minimum, the lesser of 10,000 shares or $500,000 in then-current market value. The executive officers and non-employee directors are expected to achieve the stock ownership levels under these guidelines within five years of assuming their respective positions.

        All named executive officers and non-employee directors who have been in their role for five years are in compliance with the guidelines. We anticipate that any people who are new to their roles within the last five years will, to the extent they are not currently in compliance, be in compliance with the guidelines within the required time frame.

Succession Planning

        The Board and the Company recognize the importance of continuity of leadership to ensure a smooth transition for its employees, customers, and shareholders. In furtherance of the foregoing and as described in its charter, the nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for periodically reporting to the Board the status of succession planning for senior management, including policies and principles regarding succession in the event of an emergency and/or retirement and the evaluation of potential successors to the executive officers and other key members of senior management. As a part of this process, both the Board and the nominating and corporate governance committee meet with certain members of management to review the top and emerging talent internally, their level of readiness and development needs.

Table of Contents

Mandatory Retirement Age for Board Service

        In November 2019, the Board and the nominating and corporate governance committee determined that it is advisable and in the best interest of the Company to establish a mandatory retirement age for the non-employee directors on the Board. In furtherance of the foregoing, in no event shall any non-employee be elected, re-elected and/or appointed to the Board if such non-employee is 75 years or older at the time of such election, re-election and/or appointment; provided, however, any director who began serving on the Board prior to 2006 shall be permitted to be re-elected to the Board so long as he is not 80 years or older at the time of such re-election.

Table of Contents

STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

        The following table sets forth as of March 1, 20182020 certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock of (i) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table (the "Named Executive Officers"), (ii) each non-employee director or nominee for director of the Company, (iii) all non-employee directors nominees and current Named Executive Officersexecutive officers as a group, and (iv) each shareholder known by the Company to be the owner of 5% or more of the Company's common stock.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceReports

        Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's directors and executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company's equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of stock ownership and reports of changes in stock ownership and to provide the Company with copies of all such filed forms. Based solely on its review of such copies or written representations from reporting persons, the Company believes that all reports were filed on a timely basis during the fiscal year ended December 26, 2017.31, 2019, with the exception of a Form 4 for Mr. Jacobsen that was filed on August 2, 2019 reporting the sale of 2,500 shares on July 30, 2019 pursuant to a written non-discretionary Rule 10b5-1 plan.

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

        The Company's compensation committee reviews and establishes executive compensation in connection with each Named Executive Officer'sexecutive officer's employment agreement.

We entered into new employment agreements (individually, the "2018 Employment Agreement", and collectively, the "2018 Employment Agreements") with W. Kent Taylor, Scott M. Colosi, Celia P. Catlett, and S. Chris Jacobsen, each a Named Executive Officer, on December 26, 2017, each of which has an effective date of January 8, 2018 and expires on January 7, 2021. During fiscal year 2017, each of Messrs. Taylor and Colosi and Ms. Catlett were party to employment agreements dated January 8, 2015, each of which expired on January 7, 2018 (individually, the "2015 Employment Agreement", and collectively, the "2015 Employment Agreements"), and Mr. Jacobsen was a party toWe entered into an employment agreement dated Februarywith Tonya R. Robinson, also a Named Executive Officer, on June 11, 2016,2018 and having an effective date of May 18, 2018, and with Doug W. Thompson,

Table of Contents

also a Named Executive Officer, on August 23, 2018, each of which expires on January 7, 2019 (the "2016 Employment Agreement"). Notwithstanding2021. In connection with Ms. Robinson's appointment to Chief Financial Officer, the initial termsCompany and conditions of the 2016 Employment Agreement, theMr. Colosi entered into an amendment to his 2018 Employment Agreement for Mr. Jacobsen supersedes and replaceson May 17, 2018 to reflect his 2016 Employment Agreement effectiveresignation as Chief Financial Officer of January 8, 2018.the Company while still remaining as President of the Company. As used herein, the 2015 Employment Agreementsemployment agreements, as amended (as and the 2016 Employment Agreementif applicable), with Messrs. Taylor, Colosi, Jacobsen, and Thompson, and Ms. Robinson shall be referred to collectively as the "Prior"2018 Employment Agreements" and with respect to any Named Executive Officer, as a "Prior"2018 Employment Agreement". As more particularly described below, on July 3, 2019, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement and General Release of Claims (the "Colosi Consulting Agreement") with Mr. Colosi relating to Mr. Colosi's retirement as President of the Company effective as of June 20, 2019.

        To assist in setting compensation under the 2018 Employment Agreements and pursuant to the authority granted under its charter, the compensation committee engaged Willis Towers Watson as an independent compensation consultant in 2017 to advise the compensation committee on compensation for the executive officers and director compensation,the non-employee directors, together with analysis and services related to such executive and director compensation. Specifically, the compensation committee asked the consultant to provide market data, review the design of the executive and director compensation packages, and provide recommendationsguidance on cash and equity compensation for ourthe Company's executive officers and the non-employee directors. Willis Towers Watson does not currently provide any other services to the Company, and the compensation committee has determined that Willis Towers Watson has sufficient independence from us and our executive officers to allow it to offer objective information and advice. All fees paid to Willis Towers Watson during fiscal year 2017 were in connection with their engagement by the compensation committee for the above services.

        Similar to the Prior Employment Agreements, eachEach 2018 Employment Agreement establishes a base salary throughout the term of the agreement, and a cash incentive bonus amount based on the achievement of defined goals to be established by the compensation committee. UnlikeIn addition to cash compensation, the Prior2018 Employment Agreements also provide the compensation committee with an opportunity to make annual stock awards to the Named Executive Officers, the types and amounts of which granted restrictedare subject to the compensation committee's discretion based on their annual review of the performance of the Company and of the individual Named Executive Officers. The types of stock units over a three year period, eachawards contemplated by the 2018 Employment Agreement for Ms. Catlett and Messrs. Colosi and Taylor provides for an annual grant ofAgreements are (i) restricted stock units, which grantsgrant the officersNamed Executive Officers the conditional right to receive shares of our common stock that vest after a defined period of service, (ii) "retention" restricted stock units, which vest upon vesting; however, the grants to our Chiefcompletion of the term of an individual Named Executive OfficerOfficer's agreement or such longer date as determined by the compensation committee, and our President(iii) performance stock units, which are bifurcated into grants whichcalculated based on the achievement of certain Company performance targets established by the compensation committee and vest over a period of serviceservice. As of the date of this proxy statement and grants which are based on the achievement of defined goals to be established by the compensation committee. Because Mr. Jacobsen's 2016 Employment Agreement included aas more particularly described below, each Named Executive Officer has received an annual grant of restricted stock units relating to histheir 2018 year service his(which were granted in 2017 or 2018 Employment Agreement does not include an initial grant of restricted stock units. In addition,[as applicable]), their 2019 year service (which were granted in 2019), and their 2020 year service (which were granted in 2020). Additionally, each of Mr. Jacobsen'sMessrs. Taylor, Colosi, Jacobsen, and Thompson, and Ms. Catlett'sRobinson have received grants of performance stock units relating to their 2018, Employment Agreements provides for a2019 and/or 2020 year service (as applicable). Moreover, each of Messrs. Colosi, Jacobsen, and Thompson, and Ms. Robinson have received "retention" grantgrants of restricted stock units under their respective 2018 Employment Agreements, which vest upon the completion of the term of the agreement on the condition that the officerapplicable Named Executive Officer is still serving the Company on the vesting date. Finally, Mr. Taylor's 2018 Employment Agreement also provides for a long-term "retention" grant of restricted stock units, which vest on January 8, 2023 on the condition that Mr. Taylor is still serving the Company on the vesting date. Moreover,

        Under the 2018 Employment Agreements, each officerNamed Executive Officer has agreed not to compete with us during the term of his or her employment and for a period of two years following his or her

Table of Contents

termination of employment, unless the officer'sNamed Executive Officer's employment is terminated without cause following a change in control, in which case the officerNamed Executive Officer has agreed not to compete with us through the date of the last payment of the officer'sNamed Executive Officer's severance payments. Finally, the

Table of Contents

2018 Employment Agreements also contain a "clawback" provision that enables the Company to seek reimbursement to the Company of any compensation paid to any Named Executive Officer which is required to be recovered by any law, governmental regulation or order, or stock exchange listing requirement.

        The compensation packages for our Named Executive Officers offer base salaries and target cash bonus amounts which are modest within the casual dining restaurant sector and feature restricted stock unit awards, the value of which is dependent upon the performance of the Company and the price of our common stock. The underlying philosophy reflected by this approach is that, because a significant amountcompensation committee evaluates the stock compensation for each specific Named Executive Officer on an annual basis to determine the right combination of each officer's compensation lies inrewards and incentives through the valueissuance of theservice based restricted stock units granted,and/or performance based restricted stock units to drive company performance without encouraging unnecessary or excessive risk taking by all of the officers are motivated to continually improveNamed Executive Officers as a whole. Under this approach, the Company's performance in the hope that the performance will be reflected by the stock price on the vesting dateNamed Executive Officers receive a combination of theirservice based restricted stock units and beyond. In addition, byperformance based restricted stock units, with a significant portion of some of the Named Executive Officer's compensation being tied to the grant of such performance based restricted stock units. By conditioning a significant portion of our Chiefthe Named Executive Officer's and our President'sperformance based restricted stock unit grants upon the achievement of defined performance goals to be established by the compensation committee, combined with the stock ownership guidelines for our executive officersNamed Executive Officers more particularly described above, we have created a more direct relationship between the compensation of our top executives and shareholder value, while also achieving what we believe is the right combination of rewards and incentives to drive company performance without encouraging unnecessary or excessive risk taking.value. Additionally, by only providing one year's worth of restricted stock units to our Named Executive Officers in the 2018 Employment Agreements, the compensation committee has the opportunity to adjust a significant portion of the compensation for the Named Executive Officers on an annual basis to more accurately reflect the overall performance of the Company.Company, which may include the issuance of service based restricted stock units and/or performance based restricted stock units. Overall, we believe this approach provides the Named Executive Officers with a compensation package which promotes the sustained profitability of the Company and aligns the interests of our executive officersNamed Executive Officers with those of our shareholders. The compensation packages also reflect a pragmatic response to external market conditions; that is, total compensation that is competitive with comparable positions in similar industries, including the casual dining sector of the restaurant industry, but which is reasonable and in the best interests of our shareholders.

        We believe that the overall design of the compensation packages, along with the culture and values of our Company, allows us to attract and retain top talent, while also keeping the Named Executive Officers focused on both long-term business development and short-term financial growth.

        In deciding to continue and modify many of our existing executive compensation practices, our compensation committee considered that the holders of over 83%approximately 82% of the votes cast at our 20172019 annual meeting on an advisory basis approved the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 20172019 annual meeting. While the compensation committee consulted with each of the Named Executive Officers in advance of the final approval of the 2018 Employment Agreements, noneNone of the Named Executive Officers, including Mr. Taylor, participated in the creation of their own compensation packages.

Elements of Compensation

Base SalarySalary.

    Base salaries for our Named Executive Officers are designed to provide a secure base of compensation which will be effective in motivating and retaining key executives.

Table of Contents

        Each officer's Prior Employment Agreement established an annual salary for the years shown in the table below.

        Each officer'sNamed Executive Officer's 2018 Employment Agreement establishes an annual salary for the years shown in the table below.

Incentive BonusBonus.

    Incentive bonuses are designed to reward our Named Executive Officers for the success of the Company, as measured by growth in the Company's earnings per diluted share ("EPS") and overall pre-tax profit, and for each officer'sNamed Executive Officer's individual contribution to that success. It is our belief that a significant amount of each officer'sNamed Executive Officer's compensation should be tied to the performance of the Company.

        Pursuant to the terms of the Texas Roadhouse, Inc. Cash Bonus Plan (the "Cash Bonus Plan"), the compensation committee may award an annual cash incentive to the Named Executive Officers, which is the grant of a right to receive a payment of cash that is subject to targets and maximums, and that is contingent on achievement of performance objectives during the Company's fiscal year. These cash incentives are also subject to the terms and conditions of the Prior2018 Employment Agreements and reflect each Named Executive Officer's job responsibilities and individual contribution to the 2018 Employment Agreements.success of the Company.

        Under the Cash Bonus Plan, the compensation committee established a two-pronged approach to tying the incentive compensation to the Company's performance. Under this approach, 50% of the target incentive bonus is awarded based on whether the Company achieves an annual EPS growth target of 10% (the "EPS Performance Goal"). The other 50% is based on a profit sharing pool (the "Profit Sharing Pool") comprised of 1.5% of the Company's pre-tax profits (income before taxes minus income attributable to non-controlling interests, as reported in our audited consolidated financial statements), which pool is distributed among our Named Executive Officers and certain other members of the Company's director-level management based on a pre-determined percentage interest in the pool and subject to certain pre-determined maximum amounts. After the end of the fiscal year, the

Table of Contents

compensation committee determines whether and to what extent the EPS Performance Goal has been met, and the

Table of Contents

portion of the Profit Sharing Pool to which each officerNamed Executive Officer is entitled. Depending on the level of achievement of the EPS Performance Goal each year, 50% of the incentive bonus may be reduced to a minimum of $0 or increased to a maximum of two times the target amount. Each 1% change from the EPS Performance Goal results in an increase or decrease of 10% of the portion of the target bonus amount attributable to the achievement of the EPS Performance Goal. For example, if we achieve 11% EPS growth, the bonus payable would be 110% of the portion of the target bonus attributable to the achievement of the EPS Performance Goal. Conversely, if we achieve 9% EPS growth, the bonus payable would be 90% of the portion of the target bonus attributable to the achievement of the EPS Performance Goal. The remaining 50% of the officers'Named Executive Officers' incentive bonus will fluctuate directly with Company pre-tax profits at fixed participation percentages and maximum amounts which are determined within 60 days following the commencement of the Company's fiscal year and while the pre-tax profits are not yet determined.year. The annual profit sharing component allows the Named Executive Officers to participate in a profit sharing pool with other members of the Company's director-level management team. By allowing this level of participation in the Company's overall profits, the compensation committee encourages responsible growth and aligns the interests of the officersNamed Executive Officers with those of other management employees of the Company. This portion of the incentive bonus may be reduced to a minimum of $0 if the Company ceases to be profitable or for other reasons that the compensation committee determines, and may be increased to a maximum of two times the target amount established for each individual participant. Both portions of the incentive bonus can be adjusted downward (but not upward) by the compensation committee in its discretion. Cash incentive bonuses with respect to fiscal year 20172019 were paid at 135.3%124.6% of the total target amount for all or a portion of the fiscal year in which a Named Executive Officer served in such role, based on actual EPS growth of 13.0%11.9% and aan actual Profit Sharing Pool of $3,102,743 calculated on fiscal year 2019 pre-tax profit (Profit Sharing Pool) of $180,106,845 during fiscal year 2017.$206,849,534.

        The actual amounts earned by each Named Executive Officer for fiscal year 20172019 are more fully described in "Executive Compensation." The target bonus amount, along with the minimum and maximum bonus amounts, are set forth below:

Executive Incentive Compensation for the Fiscal Year 20172019

Stock AwardsAwards.

    We make equity awards in the form of restricted stock units, which represent the conditional right to receive one share of our common stock upon satisfaction of the vesting requirements. Restricted stock units offer the Named Executive Officers a financial interest in the Company and align their interests with those of our shareholders. We also believe that the market price of our publicly traded

Table of Contents

common stock represents the most appropriate metric for determining the value of the equity portion of our Named Executive Officers' compensation packages. The overall compensation packages for our Named Executive Officers offer base salaries and target cash bonus amounts which are modest within the casual dining restaurant sector and feature restricted stock unit awards, the value of which is dependent

Table of Contents

upon the performance of the Company and the price of our common stock. The underlying philosophy reflected by this approach is that, because a significant amountcompensation committee evaluates the stock compensation for each specific Named Executive Officer on an annual basis to determine the right combination of each officer's compensation lies inrewards and incentives through the valueissuance of theservice based restricted stock units granted,and/or performance based restricted stock units to drive company performance without encouraging unnecessary or excessive risk taking by all of the officers are motivated to continually improveNamed Executive Officers as a whole. Under this approach, the Company's performance in the hope that the performance will be reflected by the stock price on the vesting dateNamed Executive Officers receive a combination of theirservice based restricted stock units and beyond. Because theperformance based restricted stock unit awards for ourunits, with a significant portion of some of the Named Executive Officers vest over a periodOfficer's compensation being tied to the grant of time andsuch performance based restricted stock units. We believe that the service based restricted stock awards are inherently performance based since their value varies in response to investor sentiment regarding overall Company performance at the time of vesting, we believe that these service based awards are inherently performance based. Byvesting. Moreover, by only providing one year's worth of restricted stock units to our Named Executive Officers in the 2018 Employment Agreements, the compensation committee has the opportunity to adjust a significant portion of the total compensation for the Named Executive Officers on an annual basis to more accurately reflect the overall performance of the Company. The PriorCompany, which may include the issuance of service based restricted stock units and/or restricted stock units based on the achievement of defined goals to be established by the compensation committee for any and/or all of our Named Executive Officer. Additionally, each 2018 Employment AgreementsAgreement for Messrs. Colosi, and Jacobsen and Ms. Catlett also provide for a "retention" grant of restricted stock units, which vest upon completion of the term of the agreement on the condition that the officer is still serving the Company on the vesting date. Additionally, each of Mr. Jacobsen'sThompson, and Ms. Catlett's 2018 Employment Agreements provides��Robinson provide for a "retention" grant of restricted stock units, which vest upon completion of the term of their 2018 Employment Agreement on the condition that the officerapplicable Named Executive Officer is still serving the Company on the vesting date, and Mr. Taylor's 2018 Employment Agreement provides for a long-term "retention" grant of restricted stock units, which vest on January 8, 2023 on the condition that Mr. Taylor is still serving the Company on the vesting date.

        In addition, both the Prior Employment Agreements and the 2018 Employment Agreements for Messrs. Taylor, Colosi, Thompson, and ColosiJacobsen and Ms. Robinson contain bifurcated awards of service based restricted stock units and performance based restricted stock units. Whileunits for all or a portion of the term of their respective 2018 Employment Agreements for Messrs. Taylor and Colosi contain an annual grant of service based restricted stock units which vest over a one year period of service (as opposed to a three year grant of service based restricted stock units that vest over a three year period in their respective Prior Employment Agreements), both the Prior Employment Agreements and the 2018 Employment Agreements contain grants of performance based restricted stock units which are based on the achievement of defined goals to be established by the compensation committee.Agreements. For the performance based awards, the compensation committee has established a two-pronged approach which mirrors the approach used for annual cash incentive bonuses. Under this approach, a percentage of the target equity award is based on whether the Company achieves the annual EPS Performance Goal, and a percentage is based on the Profit Sharing Pool comprised of 1.5% of the Company's pre-tax profits (income before taxes minus income attributable to non-controlling interests, as reported in our audited financial statements). After the end of the fiscal year, the compensation committee determines whether and to what extent the EPS Performance Goal has been met, and the portion of the Profit Sharing Pool to which each officer is entitled. Each 1% change from the EPS Performance Goal results in an increase or decrease of 10% of the portion of the target amount attributable to the achievement of the EPS Performance Goal. For example, if we achieve 11% EPS growth, the number of shares awarded would be 110% of the portion of the target amount attributable to the achievement of the EPS Performance Goal. Conversely, if we achieve 9% EPS growth, the award would be 90% of the portion of the target amount attributable to the achievement of the EPS Performance Goal. The remaining percentage of the officers'Named Executive Officers' equity award will fluctuate directly with Company pre-tax profits at fixed participation percentages and maximum amounts which are determined within 60 days following the commencement of the Company's fiscal year and while the pre-tax profits are not yet determined.year. Both portions of the performance based equity award may be reduced to a minimum of 0$0 or increased to a maximum of two times the target amount for each individual participant. Both portions of the performance based equity award can also be adjusted downward (but not upward) by the compensation committee in its discretion. Performance based equity awards with respect to fiscal year 20172019 were paid at 135.3%124.6% of the total target amount for all or a portion of the fiscal year in which a Named Executive Officer served in such role, based on actual EPS growth of 13.0%11.9% and aan actual Profit Sharing Pool of $3,102,743 calculated on fiscal year 2019 pre-tax profit (Profit Sharing Pool) of $180,106,845 during fiscal year 2017.$206,849,534. For discussion of

Table of Contents

the percentages assigned by the compensation committee to each component of the performance based equity awards for Messrs. Taylor, Colosi, Jacobsen, and Colosi,Thompson, and Ms. Robinson, refer to the associated tables below.

Table of Contents

        The number of restricted stock units granted to each officerNamed Executive Officer reflects each officer'sNamed Executive Officer's job responsibilities and individual contribution to the success of the Company.

Service Based Restricted Stock Units

        The number of service based restricted stock units granted under the Prior Employment Agreements are shown in the table below. Except as noted, the grants vest in one-third increments for Messrs. Taylor and Colosi and Ms. Catlett each January 8 over a three-year period beginning on January 8, 2016 and ending on January 8, 2018, while Mr. Jacobsen's grants vest in one-third increments each January 8 over a three-year period beginning on January 8, 2017 and ending on January 8, 2019.

Units.Table of Contents

    Except as noted below, the number of service based restricted stock units granted under the 2018 Employment Agreements are shown in the table below.below and are subject to the Named Executive Officer still serving the Company on the vesting date.

Performance Based Restricted Stock UnitsUnits.

    The number of performance based restricted stock units granted to Messrs. Taylor, Colosi, Thompson and ColosiJacobsen for 2017the 2019 fiscal year under their respective Prior 2018

Table of Contents

Employment Agreement, and the number of shares of common stock which actually vested based on the Company's performance, are shown in the table below:

Table of Contents

        The number of performance based restricted stock units granted in 2020 to Messrs. Taylor, Thompson, and ColosiJacobsen, and Ms. Robinson under their respective 2018 Employment Agreements for the 2020 fiscal year is shown in the table below. The actual number of shares that will be issued to each of Messrs. Taylor, Thompson, and ColosiJacobsen, and Ms. Robinson for fiscal year 20182020 based on achievement of the performance goals assigned to these grants by the compensation committee will not be calculated until the first quarter of 2019.2021.

Table of Contents

        The 2018 Employment Agreements further provide that the compensation committee may, in its discretion, grant additional performance based restricted stock units to Messrs. Taylor, Thompson, and ColosiJacobsen, and Ms. Robinson with respect to future performance periods.

Separation and Change in Control Arrangements

        Except in the event of a change in control, the Prior2018 Employment Agreement with Mr. Taylor provides that no severance would be paid to him upon termination of employment, but he would be entitled to receive a gift of a crisp $100 bill if his employment were to be terminated by the Company without cause before the end of the term. Mr. Taylor'sThe 2018 Employment Agreement contains the same provision. The Prior Employment Agreement for each of Messrs. Colosi, and Jacobsen, and Thompson, and Ms. CatlettRobinson provides that, except in the event of a change in control, if the Company terminates their employment without cause before the end of the term and the applicable executive officerNamed Executive Officer signs a release of all claims against the Company, then the Company will pay a severance payment equal to any bonus for a year already ended (even if not yet paid at termination), plus the officer'sNamed Executive Officer's base salary for a period of 180 days, and payment of a fixed sum ($175,000 for Mr. Colosi, $87,500 for Mr. Jacobsen and $62,500 for Ms. Catlett). The 2018 Employment Agreement for each of Messrs. Colosi and Jacobsen and Ms. Catlett contains the same provision, except that the fixed sum payments are the following: $175,000 for Mr. Colosi, $100,000 for Mr. Jacobsen, $225,000 for Mr. Thompson, and $92,500$100,000 for Ms. Catlett.Robinson). Similar payments are due to the officersNamed Executive Officers under both the Prior Employment Agreements and the 2018 Employment Agreements if employment was or is terminated by reason of death or disability before the end of the term. The Company provides these severance payments to allow for a period of transition and in exchange for a full release of claims against the Company. The salary component of the severance payments is subject to deductions and withholdings and is to be paid to the officersNamed Executive Officers in periodic installments in accordance with

Table of Contents

our normal payroll practices. The fixed sum is paid in a single lump sum, and any bonus component of the severance payments for a performance period that ended before termination is to be paid on the same date as the payment would have been made had his or her employment not been terminated.

        Both the Prior Employment Agreements and theThe 2018 Employment Agreements also provide that if the officer'sNamed Executive Officer's employment is terminated other than for cause following a change in control, or if the officerNamed Executive Officer resigns for good reason following a change in control because he or she is required to relocate, and the Company's successor does not agree to be bound by the agreement, or the officer'sNamed Executive Officer's responsibilities, pay or total benefits are reduced, then in such an event each such officerNamed Executive Officer will receive severance payments in an amount equal to the officer'sNamed Executive Officer's base salary

Table of Contents

and incentive bonus through the end of the term of the agreement but not less than one year. In addition, the officer'sNamed Executive Officer's unvested stock awards, if any, will become vested as of the date of termination. Moreover, with respect to each of the officersNamed Executive Officers under their respective 2018 Employment Agreement,Agreements, if his or her employment is terminated under such circumstances and the officerNamed Executive Officer has not yet been granted service-basedservice based restricted stock units or performance-basedperformance based restricted stock units, as applicable under the respective officer'sNamed Executive Officer's 2018 Employment Agreements, for either or both of the second and third years of his or her employment agreement, the officerNamed Executive Officer will be issued the target number of service based restricted stock units and/or performance based restricted stock units (as applicable) set forth above for each of these years, and, in the case of Mr. Jacobsen, 10,000 restricted stock units.years. The payments and acceleration of vesting of the stock awards are contingent upon the officerNamed Executive Officer signing a full release of claims against the Company. The salary component of the severance payments is subject to deductions and withholdings and is to be paid to the officersNamed Executive Officers in periodic installments in accordance with our normal payroll practices or in a lump sum at the discretion of the compensation committee and in compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The bonus component of the severance payments to the officersNamed Executive Officers is to be paid on the same date as the payment would have been made had his or her employment not been terminated.

        According to the terms of both the Prior Employment Agreements and the 2018 Employment Agreements, a change in control means that one of the following events has taken place: (1) the shareholders of the Company approve (a) a merger or statutory plan of exchange involving the Company ("Merger") in which the Company is not the continuing or surviving corporation or pursuant to which the Common Stock, $0.001 par value ("Common Stock") would be converted into cash, securities or other property, other than a Merger involving the Company in which the holders of Common Stock immediately prior to the Merger have substantially the same proportionate ownership of common stock of the surviving corporation after the Merger, or (b) a sale, lease, exchange, or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or the adoption of any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution; (2) during any period of 12 months or less, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted a majority of the Board cease for any reason to constitute a majority thereof unless the nomination or election of such new directors was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then still in office who were directors at the beginning of such period; (3) a tender or exchange offer (other than one made by (a) the Company, or (b) Mr. Taylor or any corporation, limited liability company, partnership, or other entity in which Mr. Taylor owns a direct or indirect ownership of 50% or more, or controls 50% or more of the voting power [collectively, the "Taylor Parties"]) is made for the Common Stock (or securities convertible into Common Stock) and such offer results in a portion of those securities being purchased and the offeror after the consummation of the offer is the beneficial owner (as determined pursuant to Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended [the "Exchange Act"]), directly or indirectly, of securities representing in excess of the greater of at least 20% of the voting power of outstanding securities of the Company or the percentage of the voting power of the outstanding securities of the Company collectively held by all of the Taylor Parties; or (4) any person other than a Taylor Party becomes the beneficial owner of securities representing in excess of the greater of 20% of the aggregate voting power of the outstanding securities of the Company as disclosed in a report on Schedule 13D of the Exchange Act or the percentage of the voting power of the outstanding securities of the Company collectively held by all of the Taylor Parties. No change of

Table of Contents

control will be deemed to have occurred for purposes of either an individual Prior Employment Agreement or an individual 2018 Employment Agreement by virtue of any transaction which results in the affected Named Executive Officer, or a group of persons which includes the affected Named Executive Officer, acquiring, directly or indirectly, securities representing 20% or more of the voting power of outstanding securities of the Company.

        The estimated amounts that would have been payable to a Named Executive Officer under both the Prior Employment Agreements and the 2018 Employment Agreements are more fully described in "Termination, Change of Control and Change of Responsibility Payments."

Table of Contents

        Additionally, on June 20, 2019, Mr. Colosi and the Company announced that Mr. Colosi would be retiring as President of the Company effective as of June 20, 2019. On July 3, 2019, the Company entered into the Colosi Consulting Agreement with Mr. Colosi. Under the Colosi Consulting Agreement, which expired on March 1, 2020, the Company agreed to pay Mr. Colosi an aggregate sum of $500,000 in bi-weekly installments over the term of the Colosi Consulting Agreement. In addition, the Company agreed to pay Mr. Colosi an aggregate sum of $1,400,000, payable on March 1, 2020. Under the terms of the Colosi Consulting Agreement, Mr. Colosi agreed to be available upon reasonable notice to consult on matters assigned by the Company. The Colosi Consulting Agreement also provided a general release of claims through June 20, 2019. Finally, the Colosi Consulting Agreement reaffirmed certain obligations of Mr. Colosi under his 2018 employment agreement, including, without limitation, obligations pertaining to non-competition, non-hire, and non-solicitation.

Hedging and Pledging Policies

        The Company has an insider trading policy that, among other things, prohibits all of our employees (including our executive officers) and our directors from engaging in speculative trading in the Company's shares, which prohibition includes any arrangement by which a shareholder or option holder changes his or her economic exposure to changes in the price of the stock. Prohibited arrangements include buying standardized put or call options, writing put or call options, selling stock short, buying or selling securities convertible into other securities, or merely engaging in a private arrangement where the value of the agreement varies in relation to the price of the underlying security. Such arrangements are prohibited because these transactions may give the appearance of improper trades and look disloyal. In addition, our insider trading policy strongly discourages employees (including our executive officers) and our directors from holding the Company's securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging these securities as collateral for a loan. As of the date of this proxy statement, none of our Named Executive Officers and non-employee directors hold the Company's securities in a margin account or have otherwise pledged them as collateral for a loan.

Compensation Committee Report

        The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management. Based on such review and discussions, the compensation committee recommended to the Board that the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 26, 2017.31, 2019.

        All members of the compensation committee concur in this report.

James F. Parker,R. Zarley, Chair
Gregory N. Moore
Curtis A. Warfield
Kathleen M. Widmer
James R. Zarley

Table of Contents

Summary Compensation Table

        The following table sets forth the total compensation earned with respect to the fiscal years 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 20152017 for Mr. Taylor, our Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Colosi, our President, and Ms. Robinson, our Chief Financial Officer. It also includes such information for each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers during fiscal year 2017,2019, as and if applicable.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 20172019

        The following table presents information with respect to grants of stock awards to the applicable Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 2017.2019.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table